Explains method, criteria, limits, and checks for reading unspecified honestly. Clarify the missing website idea enough to define a viable site strategy, then test what can be compared, what remains open, and where research backlog work is still needed.
How to use this page
Method first
Start with the reading method: what is known, what is assumed, and what cannot be verified yet.
Compare by criteria
Use fit, clarity, scope, and evidence quality as the main comparison points before any stronger claim.
Keep the backlog visible
Mark missing inputs, research gaps, and follow-up checks so the next step is explicit rather than implied.